@e_flux wrote:
In the LA Times, former New Yorker music writer Sasha Frere-Jones chats with Maggie Nelson, whose most recent book, The Argonauts, has brought her much-deserved critical and popular acclaim. As a result, Graywolf Press is republishing her 2007 book The Red Parts, a memoir about he court trial of the man accused of murdering her aunt. Below she discuss the formal dimensions of The Red Parts:
SF-J: “The Red Parts” is not nearly as formal unpredictable as “Bluets” and “The Argonauts,” which both needle drop on various theories and narrative strategies. “The Argonauts” even uses a bespoke footnote system (which defeats ebook versions). But maybe there is an experimental aspect to “The Red Parts” that I’m missing?
MN: “The Red Parts” is an experiment with long form narrative-ish prose. Whatever détournements it makes are folded into a very spare, straightforward seeming idiom and form. That was part of its experiment, and part of the reason why Peter Handke’s deceptively simple “A Sorrow Beyond Dreams” was such a model for me.
SF-J: “The Red Parts” was initially subtitled “A Memoir,” but you changed it to “Autobiography of a Trial.”
MN: Yeah, I’m interested in the kind of life-writing that’s inexhaustible, i.e., that has little to do with the “summing up” typically indicated by the word “memoir.” Also, since the book contains elements of my childhood, I see why it’s “memoiristic,” but since much of it is also a fairly straight-ahead documentary account of a courtroom trial, along with a meditation on criminal justice, misogyny, and more, it’s more of a nonfiction mash-up than any one autobiographical thing. So I thought “autobiography of a trial” seemed a truer description. Plus the latter subtitle pays light homage to Anne Carson’s “Autobiography of Red,” a brilliant book which has nothing to do with this book on the surface, but she’s in there, that book is in there, nonetheless.
Image of Maggie Nelson via LA Times.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1