@e_flux wrote:
At Public Seminar, Chiara Bottici, a professor of philosophy at the New School in New York, delves into a current of thought and praxis that she dubs "anarchafeminism." Bottici argues that anarchafeminism, with is longstanding intersectionality and a transnational framework for analysis and struggle, is uniquely suited to confront anti-woman oppression today. Here's an excerpt from the piece:
Strikingly enough, in all the literature engaging with intersectionality, there is barely any mention of the feminist tradition of the past that has been claiming exactly the same point for a very long time: anarchist feminism, or as I prefer to call it “anarchAfeminism.” The latter term has been introduced by social movements trying to feminize the concept, and thereby give visibility to a specifically feminist strand within the anarchist theory and practice. This anarchafeminist tradition, which has largely been neglected both in the academia and in public debate more in general, has a particular vital contribution to offer today ...
My proposal is to remedy such a gap by formulating a specific anarchafeminist approach adapted to the challenges of our time. The point is not simply to give visibility to an anarchafeminist tradition, which has been an important component within past women’s struggles, and thereby reestablish some historical continuity, although this alone would certainly be a worthwhile endeavor. Besides historical accuracy, recovering anarchafeminist insights has the crucial function of enlarging feminist strategies precisely in a moment when, as intersectional feminists have argued, different factors increasingly converge to intensify the oppression of women by creating further class, cultural, and racial cleavages among them.
Image of Emma Goldman via JSTOR Daily.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1